dblair
09-15-2008, 02:50 PM
I've been trying to modify my driving habits to increase my fuel economy using a Scan Guage. It's not as easy as it would seem.
At first I assumed the MPG gauge would be most useful but when you think about it, it's a function of speed and throttle position so I've started to use the TPS function instead. Seems more useful.
The biggest problem area seems to be Freeway during the commute. I drive in the car pool lane because I work with my wife. I don't think it's a good idea holding up traffic so that put's me at 65-70 with frequent periods of slow and go 30-40. 18 miles each way. Constantly varying TPS. Result with that added to city stop and go, 23.6 mpg.
Weekend trips on Freeway, constant 60 mph with cruise control gets 26.5. Even then with cruise engaged I'm amazed at how muck TPS fluctuates. I've found myself wondering what it would take to modify the CC to maintain throttle position regardless of speed for situations where you're not in traffic. That might get some results.
Generaly, 20 TPS or less seems to be the most economical. Comments?
At first I assumed the MPG gauge would be most useful but when you think about it, it's a function of speed and throttle position so I've started to use the TPS function instead. Seems more useful.
The biggest problem area seems to be Freeway during the commute. I drive in the car pool lane because I work with my wife. I don't think it's a good idea holding up traffic so that put's me at 65-70 with frequent periods of slow and go 30-40. 18 miles each way. Constantly varying TPS. Result with that added to city stop and go, 23.6 mpg.
Weekend trips on Freeway, constant 60 mph with cruise control gets 26.5. Even then with cruise engaged I'm amazed at how muck TPS fluctuates. I've found myself wondering what it would take to modify the CC to maintain throttle position regardless of speed for situations where you're not in traffic. That might get some results.
Generaly, 20 TPS or less seems to be the most economical. Comments?