[boneheadz]

These are two different animals in my mind.

1st, the seats being up doesn't impair the rear side vision.
2and an aftermarket cd change is usually a better value
3rd you can't fit a bike in the suzuki.
4th the element is made for dogs
5th More money but holds its value which can make a lease cheaper.

I have been a hardcore truck owner for years. the element changed that. I needed a truck that could do everything. Carry passangers, carry building supplies, my bike, my dog, take me to the cabin, to the trail head and above all I had to be able to sleep in it. Was all set to by the Nissan Frontier until I saw the mpg.

The Suzuki is a sharp car but I preffer utility over style.

Make you own decission after ready all you can. I would be willing to bet that if you bought the element you would not be dissapionted. Especially in 5 years when you trade it in and it still has value.

Just my thoughts Let us know what you decide.

 

[boneheadz]

I beg to differ.

Yes one is trucklet and one is a wagon. But they are both utility focused. There is a trend these days (which I like) to make cars/trucks that can do everything you want. They are bought be anyone with a active lifestyle. the CRV, RAV and subaru were the first generation. Now we have the Element, the Suzuki Aerio and the Mazda 5. (yes I know there is more)

Not the same class but very similar. I would like the element to be classed as a truck, because I drive trucks, but really the dmv says it is a station wagon. (dirty word)