Well, I think the highlander or the Nissan Murano are at least 5 to 10k more -- so ther are not exactly in the same price class as the E. That said, I think the E is a lot more fun and better looking.
I haven't driven it in snow yet, but since its fairly heavy and its wheelbase is not that wide or long, I would imagine it would do quite well. Its 4WD capabilities should be similar to a CRV, since its mechanicals are so similar.
Obviously the 160hp doesn't feel like a V6 -- but its torqued in such a way that I was happily surprised with its actual mountain driving abilities. You won't be blowing anyone away -- but its respectable, in my opinion.
I don't think it seats 5 and I don't think there is even belts for 3 in the back seat. THe back seats have drink holders in the middle, so its really designed for 2 and not 3. 3 would be pretty awful. THe legroom in the back is enourmous -- probably more than in the front seats, honestly.
Its fun factor is way up there -- and the unique controls are great.
You definately draw some looks here and there. Some folks don't like it -- but it seems like most do.
I haven't driven it in snow yet, but since its fairly heavy and its wheelbase is not that wide or long, I would imagine it would do quite well. Its 4WD capabilities should be similar to a CRV, since its mechanicals are so similar.
Obviously the 160hp doesn't feel like a V6 -- but its torqued in such a way that I was happily surprised with its actual mountain driving abilities. You won't be blowing anyone away -- but its respectable, in my opinion.
I don't think it seats 5 and I don't think there is even belts for 3 in the back seat. THe back seats have drink holders in the middle, so its really designed for 2 and not 3. 3 would be pretty awful. THe legroom in the back is enourmous -- probably more than in the front seats, honestly.
Its fun factor is way up there -- and the unique controls are great.
You definately draw some looks here and there. Some folks don't like it -- but it seems like most do.